Bharata Natyam at Bryn Mawr

Amelia Longo

After last weekend’s show presented by Sruti, The India Music and Dance Society, I think I could watch Priyadarsini Govind dance with just her eyebrows for an entire evening.  Govind’s ability to translate tiny motions into clear expression connected powerfully with the audience, creating a surreal feeling of role reversal — were we watching Govind, or was she watching us?  Equally adept at storytelling through movement and beautiful movement itself, Govind held me enraptured with her Bharata Natyam choreography, a classical South Indian dance based on sculptural poses, and her outstanding live musicians.

At times, it felt as if Govind was looking at me directly with her piercing, oft-pleading eyes, and as though her quick intricate changes of facial expression were somehow a reaction to my own.  Rather than existing within the world of the performance, she continually reached out to the audience, a compelling reminder that we as witnesses were also part of the story-telling.  Her embodiment of being under a lover’s spell — one finger twirling, eyes and head rolling — was the only heavy-handed gesture of the evening in my view, yet she conveyed more complex states (sarcasm, awe, and even “Come on, you can tell me!”) quite clearly.

The choreography’s repetition of tiny, expressive, precise movements, interspersed with moments of serene stillness, enabled the audience to ruminate on and fully take in each individual motion, often from multiple angles.  Govind alternated shifting just her head and eyes, then just her chest and shoulders.  She then turned slowly around in an exquisite circle, presenting the audience with varying views of the same clear, soft twitches from side to side.  And of course, the eyebrows — “flutter” is not a word I would have thought to attribute to an eyebrow movement before this performance.

Govind demonstrated a crisp use of rhythm early on, bending knees outward, rising on the balls of each foot, then thudding her heels in perfect precision with the live Carnatic orchestra. This accompaniment consisted of K.S. Balakrishnan on nattuvangam (cymbals), Gomati Nayagam Ratnam on vocals, Deepu Karunakaran Nair on violin, and Vedakrishnan Venkatesan on mridangam (a double-sided drum).  In Nee Matale Mayanura, Govind turned away a false lover with sarcasm and strength — after a moment of hesitation, she concluded by further blockading the door she’d slammed in his face, emphasizing each bar with quickening firm stomps.   Hearing Govind’s ankle bells signifying her return between each piece became thrilling,  especially as they heralded her succinct verbal storytelling before performing, giving the perfect amount of context without excessive elaboration.

Govind noted that the exceptionally powerful music accompanying Amba Kamakshi, the central piece of the evening, is rarely danced to and, as such, posed a challenge to visualize and choreograph to.  After the music began, the lights came up on Govind seated facing the back of the stage, arms outstretched, fanning out her fingers in a way that resembled shimmering.  Joyous little jumps pleasantly punctuated this dance, which otherwise consisted of the small, subtle movements and moments of stillness seen throughout the evening.

The evening ran a bit long for my taste, and I would have preferred some musical interludes to set off the two-hours of Govind’s dancing.  But aside from the length and Murugan Krishnan’s sometimes melodramatic lighting, Govind put on an exceptional show full of beautiful dancing and music, intricate emotion, and even humor.  The program notes on Bharata Natyam describe the concept of Rasa, “the aesthetic emotion that ultimately transforms the audience.”  Indeed, we were transformed.

Sruti presents Priyadarsini Govind, Goodhart Hall at Bryn Mawr College, April 28.

Share this article

Amelia Longo

Amelia Longo has worked in arts administration for the past five years, and sees live dance as often as possible. She has a background in creative and academic writing. She is a former staff writer with thINKingDANCE.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

Perception is Participatory

Brendan McCall

John Jasperse frolics amidst fields of perception in this site-specific collaboration with artist Julie Mehretu.

Four dancers move in front of a large abstract painting rich with textured color, their bodies reaching, extending, and twisting in multiple directions. Their hands and feet reach upwaerds, downwards, and away from us, creating dynamism in the air. Along the edges of the painting, bystanders stand and look--some at the dancers, others at something unseen.
Photo: Maria Baranova

Unscored Improvisation, H-O-T or Not?

Xander Cobb

Does dance need meaning to be meaningful?

Three people sit in an oblique triangle that fills the frame. To the left, a musician, Aabeizer, sits on a black bench in carpenter jeans and a dark t-shirt. His eyes are closed and his feet bare. He moves his hands around a circular plate and wooden dowels that extend from a wood board he holds against his chest. To the right, a saxophonist, Bhob Rainey, sits on a folding black chair in a black cardigan and grey pants, blowing into the mouthpiece and pressing the keys. Between them, a person with short red curls, Kayliani Sood, crosses their legs on a white stool, sitting higher than the musicians beside her. They wear brown shorts over grey pants and a black t-shirt with a blue square patch in the center. She rests one hand on her knee, and the other over their forearm, closes her eyes and tilts their head pensively to the right.
Photo: Loren Groenendaal