A white woman with dark brown hair, wearing a blue outfit, sparkly shoes, and a bright red lip that matches her red hoop earrings, lies back on a small gray table. Her mouth is wide open as if singing, one arm reaching emphatically above her head while the other grips the table tightly for balance. Her legs float in the air, parallel to one another at a slightly awkward angle. She is a rockstar in an empty room.
Photo: Jen Kertis

This is a white piece, and that’s okay

ankita

Early on in Free to Be, Katherine Kiefer Stark asks the audience if she’s nice. Why would she not be nice if she has everything she needs and everyone is nice to her? A classic white woman dilemma. She then muses that no one who has written about her work has ever called it white, though she’s always been white. Funny, because when I see Stark in a matching beige outfit, unpacking a blue suitcase with some generic, (un)identifiably white music playing in the background, asking these sorts of questions, I can’t help but think–this show is going to be some white people shit. And it is. Intentionally so. To her credit, I don’t mind at all.

Free to Be is divided into three sections, titled something like White and Jewish, Mental Gymnastics, and Nationalism. Each section is built with profundity and parody, storytelling and lipsync, tension and release. The work shines when Stark details her mundane, but complicated, internal conflicts as a white, Jewish woman using legible, yet poetic verbal and physical language. A moving example: Stark sits cross-legged, weight centered on a small wooden coffee table painted silver. The tabletop has room for one, maybe two, to sit comfortably. Fist pumping, she performs protest with loud cries of “Hey (hey), Ho (ho), the gentrifiers have got to go.” As she chants, with great effort, she tries to lift and shift the table’s legs. She says she wants to shift the system. Yet, the table doesn’t budge. No matter her intentions, unless she gives up her seat at the table, it won’t.

Linking topics like privilege, specialness, oppression, white supremacy, and ethnonationalism to her own Jewishness, Stark’s work brings up opportunities for meaningful reflections and (dis)identifications for white and/or Jewish audiences. My only qualm is that she could have said more, directly. Specifically, there is a note to parents with kids younger than 13 on the Fringe website regarding some emotionally-heavy content, including the topic of genocide. While echoes of the Israeli/American genocide in Palestine are present throughout the piece–a drawing of the US flag is made into an Iron dome, Christian and Jewish nationalisms are mentioned–genocide is never overtly spoken about. The elephant in the room stays in the shadows, nicely.

Stark says her stories are not special, but in the present US, with her set of identities, any public performance about these themes is special. So, when Free to Be chooses to stay nice, I want it to instead rightfully deserve its specialness by vocally, overtly challenging oppressive ideologies. Using her logic, why just do a “nice” performance…when you have everything you need and everyone is nice to you?
 

Free to Be, Katherine Kiefer Stark, Louis Bluver Theatre at The Drake, September 24.

Share this article

ankita

ankita is an experimental performance artist and writer invested in storytelling where content dictates genre and betrays expectation. They hold degrees in Dance and Anthropology and are regularly presenting performance and film work (inter)nationally. They are a staff writer and editor with thINKingDANCE.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

The Four Mothers of Miki Orihara, or Learning Dalcroze’s 20 Gestures with my Daughter

Caedra Scott-Flaherty

Miki Orihara explores early modern dance and mothers in her newest work.

Around 20 workshop participants pose in front of an abstract oil painting in a bright gallery. They are all in different positions inspired by the artwork. Many stretch their arms out and up as if reaching. Some arch their backs or bend forward.
Photo: Chika Kobari, courtesy of KinoSaito

Dance Leadership by the Numbers

Jennifer Passios

A Conversation with Elizabeth “Liza” Yntema of Dance Data Project®

At the RISE 2025 Summit held at the New York Library for the Performing Arts, panelists for a discussion entitled “Data is Revolutionary” gather in black office chairs with silver legs in front of a large projector screen that reads “Dance Data Project, Harriet Tubman Effect Institute, & Women Count” in a pastel blue above the title “Data is Revolutionary” in a light yellow. Six circles containing the headshots of the panelists dot the rest of the projection. Amidst the other seated speakers, Nancy Owen stands holding a microphone in her right hand. She leans forward toward the audience, eyes alight, mouth open in speech that slips through an excited smile. In the lower left corner of the frame, a bald man in a crisp blue suit brings the crook of his thumb and second finger to his chin at stage right. He looks out toward the audience with his chair angled away from the six panelists.
Photo: Victoria Detres