Photo: Susan Rethorst
Photo: Susan Rethorst

Choreographic Thinking: Practical Philosophy for Dance

Megan Bridge

A Choreographic Mind: Autobodygraphical Writings, a collection of essays and musings by Susan Rethorst, is written for philosophers. Now, when some people think about philosophy they may picture old dusty books and navel gazing, libraries full of overstuffed chairs and slanted shafts of light. But to remember the etymology of the word (philosopher = lover of wisdom) is to call up a much broader, more flexible, and contemporary group of thinkers that Rethorst’s book speaks to, about, and sometimes for. In her words, a choreographic mind is a mind that has “a kind of spatial emotional map of a situation, the emotional psychological reading of place, and of people in relation to that place and each other…” This is the philosophical realm of choreographers.

Rethorst witnesses a major trend in dance that privileges language and discourse.  She tells specifically of watching student choreographers become totally derailed by language through discussing, describing, perhaps defending their work in the making. Teachers may encourage makers to strive for clarity of choreographic intention, but “The power of having declared a singular idea invests that idea with a demand for loyalty and follow-through.” Rich or complex choreographic images, full of multiplicity and potential, get buried under words, and get narrowed into a singular interpretation… “the singular preferred association becomes a kind of proxy for the original.” A Choreographic Mind calls for giving the body’s intelligence primacy; dance and choreography needn’t rely on analytic thought to ensure intellectual rigor. This doesn’t mean that we as choreographers shouldn’t speak articulately about our work, or that we shouldn’t read theory!  Rather, Rethorst makes a case for allowing language to follow the creative process instead of lead it.

A Choreographic Mind returns regularly to, perhaps even revolves around, the concept of “affect” in bodies and movement. “Affect” is a bit of a buzz-word at the moment in theoretical circles. A description of The Affect Theory Reader  (2010, Duke University Press) defines affect as “those visceral forces beneath, alongside, or generally other than conscious knowing that can serve to drive us toward movement, thought, and ever-changing forms of relation.” A theorist I know describes affect as always asking the question (after Spinoza) “What can a body do?” With affect there is an openness to possibility that is pre-conceptual. Rethorst arrives at her use of the term independently of its use in theory. Making dances, Rethorst told me in a recent interview, has brought her to metaphysics and theories of bodies and mind. When she looks at a dance, she sees that it effects a response, it acts on a viewer, it has its own agency. This is a dance’s “affect,” for Rethorst, and it is inherently bound up with a body’s knowledge, a physical “knowing” that comes before cognitive thought.

To elucidate this physical knowing, Rethorst offers up an example from every day life: crossing the street while a car is coming. In order to get across the street, an instant judgment (which takes into account many factors: How fast is the car going? Are you in the company of a child?) is made “…with hardly a dent in that busy brain buzz of ‘thought,’ or conversation with a walking companion.” We’ve made a somatic decision, we’ve used a form of thinking that we would never get to if we were stuck on the sidewalk calculating speed, velocity, and lines of force with our cognitive mind.

Rethorst claims that we not only ignore or downplay the significance of this physical thought in our everyday lives, but we even downplay the body’s knowledge in dance, where (you’d think) it should be leaping to the forefront. Rethorst’s book comprehensively articulates many of the tenets she has formulated through a pedagogical and choreographic practice that spans three continents and three decades. Offering up personal anecdotes, philosophical musings, and practical applications, A Choreographic Mind is the essential choreographer’s companion for the 21st century.

Susan Rethorst, A Choreographic Mind: Autobodygraphical Writings2012, Theatre Academy Helsinki, Department of Dance, Kinesis 2.

Rethorst will hold a book reading and signing in January 2013 at University of the Arts, details TBA. 

Share this article

Megan Bridge

Megan Bridge is an internationally touring performer, choreographer, educator, and dance researcher based in Philadelphia. She is the co-director of Fidget, an organization for experimental performance. She previously served as Executive Director for thINKingDANCE as well as a writer and editor.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

There is Something Happening in the Basement of Judson Church

Rachel DeForrest Repinz

The relentless drive of Pink Fang’s “The Table.”

maura nguyễn donohue lunges forward onto one foot with her arms slicing outwards from her back. She wears a mustard yellow button-down shirt, navy blue coat, grey pants, and vibrant blue sneakers. She is framed by the grey-shirted backs of Shannon Yu and Rami Margron, and the darkness behind her.
Photo: Marcus Middleton

Transcendental Resistance: A Write Back Atcha

Emily “Lady Em” Culbreath

A collective reflection on Vince Johnson’s Original Scrap & First Floor Spectrum.

A spacious dance studio with a gray floor, mirrored walls, and colorful geometric murals is shown during a rehearsal for First Floor Spectrum. In the foreground, two people interact through expressive movement: one stands with an arm extended overhead while the other kneels and reaches upward toward the raised hand. Additional people are visible in the background practicing choreography, while another person stands near the right side of the room, directing. The studio contains chairs, exercise equipment, and a cluster of colorful balloons near the back wall. Natural light enters from windows along the left side of the space.
Photo: Bridgette Ivkovich