Photo: Die-Cast
Photo: Die-Cast

Moving through Shakespeare

Whitney Weinstein

Shakespeare’s words, like a foreign language, often intimidate readers, especially when they attempt to understand a story unfamiliar to them. My neighboring audience members, arguing during intermission at Die-Cast’s Pericles, seemed to feel this way. One declared that a character “definitely threw that baby into the ocean,” but was quickly contradicted by the other. A king’s riddle, seemingly solved in act 1, remained a mystery to some of us: one man exclaimed, “I have no idea what in the world the answer was!” Another laughed, “What was the riddle?”

The difference between reading the play and watching a staged performance, though, is the accessibility of the body.

I didn’t necessarily need to be acquainted with the plot’s details to have a sense of its overarching themes, to disdain a character, or grasp a situation. I could perceive the love, conflict, and political intricacies without comprehending the words. With lust, limbs elongated to wrap around merging bodies. When hierarchy was asserted, lips and brows tensed. As violence turned to bargaining, gestures slowed.

I was interested in congruency of spoken text, voice intonation, facial expression, and body movement. How did they join (or not)? If I closed my eyes, would I have the same experience as if I closed my ears? In the moment when Pericles was reunited with his daughter, did I respond equally to visual and auditory cues?

In Die-Cast’s version, absolutely. The synchrony of voice and movement heightened my emotional response.

The cast was particularly attentive to the circular, domed space, which resonated and amplified effects. A cappella voices harmonized. They sang melodies that layered into canons.

At one point, two characters faced each other, arguing, as three ensemble members inched towards them, crouching. Speeding up as the argument heated, they fueled the momentum of the moment. As they closed in, the noise roared like the explosion of a simmering volcano.

In that instant, I felt the concurring elements: body, voice, and environment fused, propelling me on a journey that paralleled the characters’. I got it.

Despite differences in era and language, movement remains relevant. The human capacity for physical communication is a strength that could overcome communicative barriers.

Pericles, Die-Cast, The Rotunda, September 7-9, http://fringearts.com/event/pericles-2/

Share this article

Whitney Weinstein

Whitney H. Weinstein is a dance educator, choreographer, writer, and professional mover. She is an editor and staff writer with thINKingDANCE. Learn more.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

The Epstein Files and Redacted Bodies 

Megan Mizanty

An interview with choreographer Matthew Steffens on ResistDance vs. Redaction

In a close up photograph, ten dancers in spaghetti-strap leotards lean in, their eyes covered by a sheer black cloth. The middle dancer, closest to the camera, is mid-scream. Behind the dancer is the newly engraved building signage reading “The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Center.” Some words are covered by the dancers’ heads.
Photo: Courtesy of The First Amendment Troop

Afterglow: The Dancers of KYL/D Take a Final Bow

E. Wallis Cain Carbonell

‘Anticipating something and hoping it will be everything you wished for’

Two dancers in long-sleeved red tops face away from us with arms round one another’s waists as their free arms reach outwards. There are singular, red feathers extending from their heads many feet into the upwards space. To the left of the duet, we see a large Taiko drum.
Photo: Mike Hurwitz