Photo: Die-Cast
Photo: Die-Cast

Moving through Shakespeare

Whitney Weinstein

Shakespeare’s words, like a foreign language, often intimidate readers, especially when they attempt to understand a story unfamiliar to them. My neighboring audience members, arguing during intermission at Die-Cast’s Pericles, seemed to feel this way. One declared that a character “definitely threw that baby into the ocean,” but was quickly contradicted by the other. A king’s riddle, seemingly solved in act 1, remained a mystery to some of us: one man exclaimed, “I have no idea what in the world the answer was!” Another laughed, “What was the riddle?”

The difference between reading the play and watching a staged performance, though, is the accessibility of the body.

I didn’t necessarily need to be acquainted with the plot’s details to have a sense of its overarching themes, to disdain a character, or grasp a situation. I could perceive the love, conflict, and political intricacies without comprehending the words. With lust, limbs elongated to wrap around merging bodies. When hierarchy was asserted, lips and brows tensed. As violence turned to bargaining, gestures slowed.

I was interested in congruency of spoken text, voice intonation, facial expression, and body movement. How did they join (or not)? If I closed my eyes, would I have the same experience as if I closed my ears? In the moment when Pericles was reunited with his daughter, did I respond equally to visual and auditory cues?

In Die-Cast’s version, absolutely. The synchrony of voice and movement heightened my emotional response.

The cast was particularly attentive to the circular, domed space, which resonated and amplified effects. A cappella voices harmonized. They sang melodies that layered into canons.

At one point, two characters faced each other, arguing, as three ensemble members inched towards them, crouching. Speeding up as the argument heated, they fueled the momentum of the moment. As they closed in, the noise roared like the explosion of a simmering volcano.

In that instant, I felt the concurring elements: body, voice, and environment fused, propelling me on a journey that paralleled the characters’. I got it.

Despite differences in era and language, movement remains relevant. The human capacity for physical communication is a strength that could overcome communicative barriers.

Pericles, Die-Cast, The Rotunda, September 7-9, http://fringearts.com/event/pericles-2/

Share this article

Whitney Weinstein

Whitney H. Weinstein is a dance educator, choreographer, writer, and professional mover. She is an editor and staff writer with thINKingDANCE. Learn more.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

It would seem we need each other

Emilee Lord

The GREEF of Christina Gelsone at Baryshnikov Arts Center

Tissues are scattered all over the black box theater floor. Upstage a white wire waste paper basket sits upside down and empty. On a huge pile of tissues lies a woman in black with yellow crocs, yellow sleeves sticking out of her coat, a yellow scarf and white and yellow pompom knit hat. She stares up at the ceiling. She has a pair of red crocs on her chest.
Photo: Maria Baranova

When Tradition Takes the Stage, I Stop to Watch

Ziying Cui

Two Chinese dance dramas make me reconsider what I call “my culture.”

Five dancers in Awakening Lion hold ornate lion heads against a dark stage. White, blue, gold, and red heads form an arc above a black lion head held by one of the story’s heroes (a lion dance champion) in a deep side lunge at the front. The performers wear layered, earth-toned tunics with wrapped forearms and lower legs.
Photo: Guangdong Song and Dance Theatre