Photo: Sean Thomas Boyt
Photo: Sean Thomas Boyt

Digital Dances/Imagined Scores

Eleanor Goudie-Averill

For the Digital Fringe, Sean Thomas Boyt (STB) has created How To Dance, 54 “minimal dance scores,” accessible through the Fringe website. The project page opens with several critiques of the work, before we see it ourselves. Reviews range from “a brilliant voice out of the millennial think piece era“ to “barely legible.” STB calls the work “post-post-post modern” (maybe a catch-all for everything being made currently).

The scores appear as clickable links (which open as single-page PDFs) below a short description of how one might use them. If you’re unfamiliar, a dance score is a set of choreographic instructions, or generalized set of directions for creating movement.* Does STB’s audience know what a dance score is? Does that matter? Does it matter if you enact the scores, or just read them through?

The scores range in complexity and depth. In the first, A Collaboration, we are encouraged simply to meet up with a friend. Others are tongue in cheek: the score for Follow Someone reads “Anyone.” Some are inside jokes about dance: Al Dente reads, “Noodle until desired doneness” (“noodling” is a term for totally unstructured improvisation). Floorwork describes a basic Bartenieff Fundamental pattern often done in dance classes, and Closet Monster requires a full Vaganova barre. In the final score, STB says, “Remember, nothing is literal in dance—Could that car be trained by Trisha Brown?” Other scores are vague: A Gesture Structure provides a pattern of the letters and no further instruction. Crushin’ It is a list of colors to “interpret at will.” Only a few actually tell you which movements to do and in what order. This one is best done in order and in unison is a word search. The scores could keep anyone busy for a long time.

In tD’s Digital Fringe preview, STB described the scores as “unperformed dances.” I like this, especially because, he says, any dance produced using the scores are as yet unseen and enacted privately, or have been envisioned or danced in the imagination.

How To Dance, Sean Thomas Boyt, Digital Fringe, September 6-23

*Footnote for the curious: Scores in dance are certainly a post-modern thing, and Trisha Brown, widely known for using scores in her work (see the score for Accumulation), credits the brilliant Simone Forti as originator of score-based choreography. Forti’s Handbook in Motion (1974) details many of her scores. In A Choreographer’s HandbookJonathan Burrows identifies two kinds of dance scores: “First… what is written is a representation of the piece itself,” and second, the score is “a tool for information, image and inspiration, … a source for what you will see” (Burrows, 2004). Yoko Ono made scores for performance and film; see her book Grapefruit (1964). Another rich resource for using scores in dancemaking is the Forsythe Company’s Motion Bank.

Share this article

Eleanor Goudie-Averill

Eleanor Goudie-Averill is a 2007 MFA Dance Performance graduate of the University of Iowa and currently dances for Group Motion and Tori Lawrence + Co in Philadelphia. Since 2007, she has co-directed the Stone Depot Dance Lab, a collaborative team of performing, visual, and sound artists whose mission is to create honest and experiential dances. She is a former staff writer with thINKingDANCE.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

The Four Mothers of Miki Orihara, or Learning Dalcroze’s 20 Gestures with my Daughter

Caedra Scott-Flaherty

Miki Orihara explores early modern dance and mothers in her newest work.

Around 20 workshop participants pose in front of an abstract oil painting in a bright gallery. They are all in different positions inspired by the artwork. Many stretch their arms out and up as if reaching. Some arch their backs or bend forward.
Photo: Chika Kobari, courtesy of KinoSaito

Dance Leadership by the Numbers

Jennifer Passios

A Conversation with Elizabeth “Liza” Yntema of Dance Data Project®

At the RISE 2025 Summit held at the New York Library for the Performing Arts, panelists for a discussion entitled “Data is Revolutionary” gather in black office chairs with silver legs in front of a large projector screen that reads “Dance Data Project, Harriet Tubman Effect Institute, & Women Count” in a pastel blue above the title “Data is Revolutionary” in a light yellow. Six circles containing the headshots of the panelists dot the rest of the projection. Amidst the other seated speakers, Nancy Owen stands holding a microphone in her right hand. She leans forward toward the audience, eyes alight, mouth open in speech that slips through an excited smile. In the lower left corner of the frame, a bald man in a crisp blue suit brings the crook of his thumb and second finger to his chin at stage right. He looks out toward the audience with his chair angled away from the six panelists.
Photo: Victoria Detres