Photo: Michael Slobodian
Photo: Michael Slobodian

Stretching the Boundaries of Dance Fusion

Gregory King

Though not a new concept, dance fusion has lent itself to new aesthetics in the field. With the blending of classical ballet and modern to create what is currently known as contemporary dance, merging styles can open the door to new movement potential and heighten the visual experience of the viewer.

Montreal based RUBBERBANDance Group demonstrated their contribution to dance fusion at the Annenberg Center with a movement vocabulary honed over ten years.  Their merging of classical ballet, hip-hop, and contemporary to produce the Rubberband method evolved from Artistic Director Victor Quijada’s experiences in hip-hop clubs of his native Los Angeles to his tenure with companies like THARP!, Ballet Tech and Les Grands Ballets Canadiens.

The local premiere of Quijada’s Empirical Quotient, an evening length work of his six-member company, effectively showcased his technique through extreme physicality, agility, theatricality, and partnering.

The audience was allowed a glimpse into Quijada’s creative world as the dancers used the stage to warm up before the show.  From handstands and cartwheels, to back flips and breakdancing, they prepared the stage as if testing the ground for battle.

“Standby, lights, music!” a voice over the loud speaker announced. 

The dancers huddled together and then slowly, like a rubber band, the group expanded, pulling away from one another.

Empirical Quotient abstractly dealt with human emotions and the effects of time on self-perception and identity through vignettes of groups, duets, and trios. The sextet created and explored relationships by investigating the tensions that exist within structures and the need to claim your individuality within those structures. Noticeable to me was a recurring choreographic design as Quijada used the music to instruct his dancers when to start and stop; a break in the music would cause the dancers to pause, only to resume as it continued.

Waving, a hip-hop dance move of the 70s, was seen in many iterations throughout the piece. It is accomplished by the controlled flow of energy when alternating between tensing and relaxing certain isolated body parts. This wave-like visual could also be seen in the partnering sections where one dancer would react to the touch of another. Upon impact, the dancer being touched would initiate a movement that rippled to other parts.

Versions of other hip-hop dance steps like the electric boogie, up-rocking, b-boying, and popping overlapped with a la seconde turns, glissades and rond de jambes, creating an aesthetic that required and delivered stability in moments of off-centeredness.

The fusion was visually interesting when the company seamlessly moved from one genre to the next, and exciting when they lived in the off-centeredness of Quijada’s choreography, but I found myself, at various points during the performance, losing interest. These moments reminded me of the limitations I have seen in companies where the artistic directors serve as sole choreographers. The homogeneity of style was one problem I had with Empirical Quotient.

Another problem I had was when the dancers onstage would interact with an invisible member of the tech crew who would announce light and sound cues throughout the piece. These moments may have been more successful if they were more frequent or were more strategically placed but they appeared to be an afterthought, as they were not effectively integrated to establish a connection between the choreography or the narrative.

Although those moments didn’t work for me, I was elated at the fact that Quijada’s choreography eradicated gender specific formulations by exhibiting the physicality of both the male and female dancers. By equalizing the requirements and expectations from all six dancers, Quijada added to the dialogue on dance and gender. From back handsprings to floor spins, his de–gendered vocabulary, was worn with ease by the entire cast who stretched themselves past the expectations of any one form.

Empirical Quotient, RUBBERBANDance Group, Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts, April 16th -18th, www.annenbergcenter.org, www.rubberbandance.com

Share this article

Gregory King

Gregory King is a culturally responsive educator, performance artist, activist, and movement maker who received his MFA in Choreographic Practice and Theory from Southern Methodist University and is certified in Elementary Labanotation from the Dance Notation Bureau. His dance training began at the Washington Ballet and continued at American University and Dance Theatre of Harlem. He is a former Decolonizing Dance Director and editor at thINKingDANCE. Learn more.

PARTNER CONTENT

Keep Reading

Simone Forti—A Remembrance

Eric Schoefer

"Notice what you notice"

Photo: An evening with Simone Forti, K.J. Holmes and Daniel Lepkoff And a conversation with the artists moderated by Wendy Perron. "Sundays on Broadway" Cathy Weis Projects Performers: performance photographed: Sunday, June 4, 2017; 6:00 PM at WeisAcres in SoHo, 537 Broadway, #3 (between Prince and Spring Streets) NYC; Photograph: © 2017 Richard Termine PHOTO CREDIT - Richard Termine
Photo: Cathy Weis

Butoh: Addressing The Discomfort

Caitlin Green

There’s drool, (and lots of it).

A maroon graphic says “Philadelphia Butoh Collective” in white bold font. Below the words there’s a black emblem with an image of a person sitting on the ground with one foot and their arms raised in the air. Red lettering overlays the image and also reads “Philadelphia Butoh Collective. To the right, lining the border, there are duplicate images of two people in motion. One is bent over from the waist with arms hanging to the ground, and the other stands with bent knees, hinging slightly backward with one arm outstretched and the other folded over their torso. To the far left border, vertical lettering reads “two new pieces” in black, bold font.
Photo: Philadelphia Butoh Collective